<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kill the Traditional News Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/</link>
	<description>Stretching Boundaries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/comment-page-1/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goelastic.com/theblog/?p=757#comment-4147</guid>
		<description>Thank you for reading and for your comment. There are some cases when a news release is a viable tool and they are also important for SEO to create more online real estate for the brand/company. But what it comes down to, to get meaningful coverage/pickup, is how you can pitch it to a reporter. Give a reporter a viable story that doesn&#039;t simply focus on that brand/company, but rather, a broader trend, and you might get something valuable in return. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for reading and for your comment. There are some cases when a news release is a viable tool and they are also important for SEO to create more online real estate for the brand/company. But what it comes down to, to get meaningful coverage/pickup, is how you can pitch it to a reporter. Give a reporter a viable story that doesn&#8217;t simply focus on that brand/company, but rather, a broader trend, and you might get something valuable in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Party NZ</title>
		<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/comment-page-1/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Party NZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goelastic.com/theblog/?p=757#comment-4146</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s clear that press releases don&#039;t work well in many cases. 

But what do you suggest can replace it as a way of getting mainstream news coverage? By that I mean print and TV, not online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s clear that press releases don&#8217;t work well in many cases. </p>
<p>But what do you suggest can replace it as a way of getting mainstream news coverage? By that I mean print and TV, not online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die, News Release, Die! &#171; Elasticity</title>
		<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/comment-page-1/#comment-3918</link>
		<dc:creator>Die, News Release, Die! &#171; Elasticity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goelastic.com/theblog/?p=757#comment-3918</guid>
		<description>[...] we’ve written on our blog prior, news releases are, well, kind of dumb and should die. Reporters don’t read them nor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we’ve written on our blog prior, news releases are, well, kind of dumb and should die. Reporters don’t read them nor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JillPR</title>
		<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>JillPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goelastic.com/theblog/?p=757#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of when I was in PR school. My friend and I had both previously graduated from journalism a few years back, and our heads almost exploded when they told us we could make up quotes. At least they made sure those quotes were a bit meatier than &quot;We&#039;re so very excited here at X Corp blah blah&quot;. 

What would you suggest take the place of the news release? I know journalists are pressed for time, but PR people often are too. I don&#039;t have time to call every news org. in town (and frankly I suspect they&#039;d hate that.) So what&#039;s the solution? Just make it much shorter/to the point, or do any with it in favour of...what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of when I was in PR school. My friend and I had both previously graduated from journalism a few years back, and our heads almost exploded when they told us we could make up quotes. At least they made sure those quotes were a bit meatier than &#8220;We&#8217;re so very excited here at X Corp blah blah&#8221;. </p>
<p>What would you suggest take the place of the news release? I know journalists are pressed for time, but PR people often are too. I don&#8217;t have time to call every news org. in town (and frankly I suspect they&#8217;d hate that.) So what&#8217;s the solution? Just make it much shorter/to the point, or do any with it in favour of&#8230;what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLAUDIA</title>
		<link>http://goelastic.com/theblog/index.php/2010/03/kill-the-traditional-news-release/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>CLAUDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goelastic.com/theblog/?p=757#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>in terms of getting coverage of the actual &quot;news&quot; in the release, you are absolutely right.  But ever since we went electronic, I&#039;ve welcomed releases(as long as they never, ever, ever led to a follow-up phone call!).  Why? Because I would put them into an electronic subject file.  I remember, a few years back, starting an electronic collecting file on chief environmental officers.  Whenever I got a release mentioning that title, I put it in the file. Once I had critical mass of companies, I did a big feature on the hottest new C-Suite job.  Those press releases gave me my sources.  So keep &#039;em comin&#039;, boys, knowing we won&#039;t read them, but we may well not spike them either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in terms of getting coverage of the actual &#8220;news&#8221; in the release, you are absolutely right.  But ever since we went electronic, I&#8217;ve welcomed releases(as long as they never, ever, ever led to a follow-up phone call!).  Why? Because I would put them into an electronic subject file.  I remember, a few years back, starting an electronic collecting file on chief environmental officers.  Whenever I got a release mentioning that title, I put it in the file. Once I had critical mass of companies, I did a big feature on the hottest new C-Suite job.  Those press releases gave me my sources.  So keep &#8216;em comin&#8217;, boys, knowing we won&#8217;t read them, but we may well not spike them either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

